Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Universal Life “Monthly Charges” Are Statutory Premiums—and Trigger § 234(2)’s Monthly-Premium Exception

Universal Life “Monthly Charges” Are Statutory Premiums—and Trigger § 234(2)’s Monthly-Premium Exception

Date: Jan 21, 2026
Universal Life “Monthly Charges” Are Statutory Premiums—and Trigger § 234(2)’s Monthly-Premium Exception 1. Introduction Fayez Dahleh v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026)...
Objective Vehicle Protective Searches Under Long: Furtive Movements, Cannabis Odor, and Weapons-Related Supervision Support Reasonable Suspicion; Post-Sentence Family Remarks Require “Reliance” to Create Constitutional Error

Objective Vehicle Protective Searches Under Long: Furtive Movements, Cannabis Odor, and Weapons-Related Supervision Support Reasonable Suspicion; Post-Sentence Family Remarks Require “Reliance” to Create Constitutional Error

Date: Jan 21, 2026
Objective Vehicle Protective Searches Under Long: Furtive Movements, Cannabis Odor, and Weapons-Related Supervision Support Reasonable Suspicion; Post-Sentence Family Remarks Require “Reliance” to...
Objective “Long” Vehicle Protective Searches: Cannabis Odor, Furtive Movements, and Officer Demeanor

Objective “Long” Vehicle Protective Searches: Cannabis Odor, Furtive Movements, and Officer Demeanor

Date: Jan 21, 2026
Objective “Long” Vehicle Protective Searches: Cannabis Odor, Furtive Movements, and Officer Demeanor I. Introduction United States v. Dazmine Erving (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026) addresses two recurring...
Primary-Significance Governs Genericness (Not “Exclusive Descriptor”): Survey-Driven Reversal of “Pizza Puff” Preliminary Injunction

Primary-Significance Governs Genericness (Not “Exclusive Descriptor”): Survey-Driven Reversal of “Pizza Puff” Preliminary Injunction

Date: Jan 18, 2026
Primary-Significance Governs Genericness (Not “Exclusive Descriptor”): Survey-Driven Reversal of “Pizza Puff” Preliminary Injunction Case: Illinois Tamale Company, Inc. v. LC Trademarks, Inc. and...
“Primary Significance” Controls Genericness for Incontestable Marks; Descriptive Fair Use Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity

“Primary Significance” Controls Genericness for Incontestable Marks; Descriptive Fair Use Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity

Date: Jan 18, 2026
“Primary Significance” Controls Genericness for Incontestable Marks; Descriptive Fair Use Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity 1. Introduction In Illinois Tamale Company, Inc. v. LC...
Incontestable Marks and Genericness at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: “Primary Significance” Governs, and Fair Use Describes Characteristics—not Identity

Incontestable Marks and Genericness at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: “Primary Significance” Governs, and Fair Use Describes Characteristics—not Identity

Date: Jan 18, 2026
Incontestable Marks and Genericness at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: “Primary Significance” Governs, and Fair Use Describes Characteristics—not Identity Introduction In Illinois Tamale Company,...
Primary-Significance Controls Genericness of Incontestable Marks; Fair-Use “Descriptive” Prong Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity

Primary-Significance Controls Genericness of Incontestable Marks; Fair-Use “Descriptive” Prong Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Primary-Significance Controls Genericness of Incontestable Marks; Fair-Use “Descriptive” Prong Turns on Product Characteristics, Not Product Identity Illinois Tamale Company, Inc. v. LC Trademarks,...
CEA Two-Year Bar Not Avoided by “John Doe” Pleading: No Rule 15 Relation-Back Without a “Mistake,” and Investment Managers Must Plead Their Own Trading Losses for Article III Standing

CEA Two-Year Bar Not Avoided by “John Doe” Pleading: No Rule 15 Relation-Back Without a “Mistake,” and Investment Managers Must Plead Their Own Trading Losses for Article III Standing

Date: Jan 17, 2026
CEA Two-Year Bar Not Avoided by “John Doe” Pleading: No Rule 15 Relation-Back Without a “Mistake,” and Investment Managers Must Plead Their Own Trading Losses for Article III Standing Case: LJM...
Sham Declarations Cannot Manufacture Summary-Judgment Disputes; No Per Se Eighth Amendment Violation from a Cell Lacking an In-Cell Toilet/Sink When Reasonable Mitigation Exists

Sham Declarations Cannot Manufacture Summary-Judgment Disputes; No Per Se Eighth Amendment Violation from a Cell Lacking an In-Cell Toilet/Sink When Reasonable Mitigation Exists

Date: Jan 16, 2026
Sham Declarations Cannot Manufacture Summary-Judgment Disputes; No Per Se Eighth Amendment Violation from a Cell Lacking an In-Cell Toilet/Sink When Reasonable Mitigation Exists I. Introduction In...
Smith v. Pugh: Caution Against “Received-By” Deadlines for Prisoner Filings and the Centrality of Medical Causation in Ramadan-Meal RLUIPA/Eighth Amendment Claims

Smith v. Pugh: Caution Against “Received-By” Deadlines for Prisoner Filings and the Centrality of Medical Causation in Ramadan-Meal RLUIPA/Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Jan 16, 2026
Smith v. Pugh: Caution Against “Received-By” Deadlines for Prisoner Filings and the Centrality of Medical Causation in Ramadan-Meal RLUIPA/Eighth Amendment Claims Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
CEA Two-Year Limitations, No Rule 15 “Mistake” for John Doe Defendants, and Strict Pleading of Investment-Manager Standing in VIX Manipulation Claims

CEA Two-Year Limitations, No Rule 15 “Mistake” for John Doe Defendants, and Strict Pleading of Investment-Manager Standing in VIX Manipulation Claims

Date: Jan 16, 2026
CEA Two-Year Limitations, No Rule 15 “Mistake” for John Doe Defendants, and Strict Pleading of Investment-Manager Standing in VIX Manipulation Claims Introduction Case: Two Roads Shared Trust v....
Acquiescence to a Restitution Credit at Sentencing Waives Appellate Challenge (and the Defendant Bears the Burden to Prove Offsets)

Acquiescence to a Restitution Credit at Sentencing Waives Appellate Challenge (and the Defendant Bears the Burden to Prove Offsets)

Date: Jan 16, 2026
Acquiescence to a Restitution Credit at Sentencing Waives Appellate Challenge (and the Defendant Bears the Burden to Prove Offsets) 1. Introduction Case: United States v. Sean Grusd (7th Cir. Jan....
Seventh Circuit Reinforces Waiver and Presumed Reasonableness in Anders Sentencing Appeals After Defendant Accepts the Guidelines Range

Seventh Circuit Reinforces Waiver and Presumed Reasonableness in Anders Sentencing Appeals After Defendant Accepts the Guidelines Range

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Seventh Circuit Reinforces Waiver and Presumed Reasonableness in Anders Sentencing Appeals After Defendant Accepts the Guidelines Range Case: United States v. Anthony M. Taylor (No. 25-2218) Court:...
Seventh Circuit: § 1981 Complaints Must Plead Non-Speculative Race Causation; Weak Comparator Allegations Cannot Supply Plausibility

Seventh Circuit: § 1981 Complaints Must Plead Non-Speculative Race Causation; Weak Comparator Allegations Cannot Supply Plausibility

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Seventh Circuit: § 1981 Complaints Must Plead Non-Speculative Race Causation; Weak Comparator Allegations Cannot Supply Plausibility Case: Yubo Miao v. United Airlines, Inc. (No. 25-1649) Court:...
Recklessness Is the Mens Rea for 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in the Seventh Circuit (Post-Counterman)

Recklessness Is the Mens Rea for 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in the Seventh Circuit (Post-Counterman)

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Recklessness Is the Mens Rea for 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in the Seventh Circuit (Post-Counterman) I. Introduction United States v. Farhan Sheikh (7th Cir. Jan. 13, 2026) addresses the constitutionality...
Generalized “Dear Colleague” Pressure Plus Process Errors, Without Case-Specific Evidence, Does Not Show Title IX Sex Bias

Generalized “Dear Colleague” Pressure Plus Process Errors, Without Case-Specific Evidence, Does Not Show Title IX Sex Bias

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Generalized “Dear Colleague” Pressure Plus Process Errors, Without Case-Specific Evidence, Does Not Show Title IX Sex Bias Case: Matthew Metzler v. Loyola University Chicago Court: United States...
Functional Software Descriptions Are Not “Concrete Secrets” Under the DTSA; Late-Stage “Other Proprietary Information” Theories May Be Excluded

Functional Software Descriptions Are Not “Concrete Secrets” Under the DTSA; Late-Stage “Other Proprietary Information” Theories May Be Excluded

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Functional Software Descriptions Are Not “Concrete Secrets” Under the DTSA; Late-Stage “Other Proprietary Information” Theories May Be Excluded Introduction NEXT Payment Solutions, Inc. v. CLEAResult...
Defective Notice-to-Appear Time/Date Omissions Are Forfeitable Claim-Processing Errors; Hardship Denials Reviewed Under Clear-and-Unmistakable-Error Framework

Defective Notice-to-Appear Time/Date Omissions Are Forfeitable Claim-Processing Errors; Hardship Denials Reviewed Under Clear-and-Unmistakable-Error Framework

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Defective Notice-to-Appear Time/Date Omissions Are Forfeitable Claim-Processing Errors; Hardship Denials Reviewed Under Clear-and-Unmistakable-Error Framework Introduction In Francisco...
§ 1983 Limits: No Fifth Amendment Due Process Claim Against State Actors; Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Reviewing Warrant Affidavits

§ 1983 Limits: No Fifth Amendment Due Process Claim Against State Actors; Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Reviewing Warrant Affidavits

Date: Jan 14, 2026
§ 1983 Limits: No Fifth Amendment Due Process Claim Against State Actors; Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Reviewing Warrant Affidavits 1. Introduction Dale Economan v. James Luttrull (Seventh...
Vacated-Precedent Reliance Is Not Remandable Error When the BIA Affirms on Independent, Dispositive Grounds and the Petitioner Waives Merits

Vacated-Precedent Reliance Is Not Remandable Error When the BIA Affirms on Independent, Dispositive Grounds and the Petitioner Waives Merits

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Vacated-Precedent Reliance Is Not Remandable Error When the BIA Affirms on Independent, Dispositive Grounds and the Petitioner Waives Merits I. Introduction In Brenda Organiz-Perez De Lorenzo v....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert