Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen

“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen Introduction This Seventh Circuit decision addresses whether Illinois may bar...

      “Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen

“Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen Introduction In Benjamin...
Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion

Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion Introduction In Karen Moratz v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance...
Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying

Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying Introduction In United States v....
“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms

“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms Introduction In United States v. Lapierre...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C) Introduction In United States v. Miguel...
Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence

Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence Introduction In Tanya Blumenshine v. Bloomington School District No. 87, the...
Expert Evidence, Causation, and Pattern Proof: Seventh Circuit Tightens Eighth Amendment and Monell Paths in Prison Mental-Health Cases

Expert Evidence, Causation, and Pattern Proof: Seventh Circuit Tightens Eighth Amendment and Monell Paths in Prison Mental-Health Cases

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Expert Evidence, Causation, and Pattern Proof: Seventh Circuit Tightens Eighth Amendment and Monell Paths in Prison Mental-Health Cases Introduction In Cordell Sanders v. Andrea Moss, et al., the...
Protected Advice at Life’s End: Seventh Circuit Holds Indiana’s Funeral-Licensing Ban on Death-Doula Counseling Fails Even Under Intermediate Scrutiny—and Consent Orders Don’t Waive Federal Rights

Protected Advice at Life’s End: Seventh Circuit Holds Indiana’s Funeral-Licensing Ban on Death-Doula Counseling Fails Even Under Intermediate Scrutiny—and Consent Orders Don’t Waive Federal Rights

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Protected Advice at Life’s End: Seventh Circuit Holds Indiana’s Funeral-Licensing Ban on Death-Doula Counseling Fails Even Under Intermediate Scrutiny—and Consent Orders Don’t Waive Federal Rights...
“Promoting the Enactment of Legislation” Qualifies as an Official Act; No Per Se Miranda Rule During Warrant Stops; No Duty to Delay Sentencing for Pending Guidelines Amendments — Commentary on United States v. Weiss (7th Cir. 2025)

“Promoting the Enactment of Legislation” Qualifies as an Official Act; No Per Se Miranda Rule During Warrant Stops; No Duty to Delay Sentencing for Pending Guidelines Amendments — Commentary on United States v. Weiss (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
“Promoting the Enactment of Legislation” Qualifies as an Official Act; No Per Se Miranda Rule During Warrant Stops; No Duty to Delay Sentencing for Pending Guidelines Amendments — Commentary on...
No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith Exception

No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith Exception

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith...
Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025)

Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction...
“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame

“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame

Date: Aug 31, 2025
“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame Case: Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James A. Britton,...
When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement

When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement Introduction In Mazen Agha...
Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading...
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity Introduction This...
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims Introduction In Frankie Nelson v. County of Cook (No. 24-2123), the Seventh Circuit...
Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): A Commentary on Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA

Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): A Commentary on Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): Commentary on Grand Trunk Corporation & Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. TSA, 7th Cir. (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA and the Recognition of Continuous Cyber-Threats as Statutory Emergencies

“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA and the Recognition of Continuous Cyber-Threats as Statutory Emergencies

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corporation v. Transportation Security Administration Introduction Grand Trunk Corporation and its subsidiary, Illinois Central Railroad Company...
“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2)

“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2) 1 · Introduction Grand Trunk Corporation and its...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert